I myself love Arch because of the user centric approach that it has, and it's vast wiki that has fixes for literally everything. My personal recommendation would be using Fedora for a while and trying out it's various flavours, in my own experience, Fedora has been the most stable for me with the least chances for breaking.Īgain, there is no perfect distro, ultimately every distro is just a way to interact with your computer, whatever works best for you, is the best distro for you, so you shouldn't keep Arch as your goal. Once you feel comfortable in the terminal and have confidence that you won't break anything, you can try arch, or you can still keep using Ubuntu or Fedora with Flatpaks, you won't find a difference in day to day usage at all, other than slightly more up to date packages and newer kernel with the latest optimisations. You should first find the DE you are comfortable in, then start learning about basic terminal commands, package management, how to use flatpaks from the terminal rather than a GUI, etc etc. When you first start with linux, your main priority should be getting used to the GUI and getting your feet wet with the terminal, only when you go deep will you notice the differences between arch and Ubuntu based systems, otherwise, you can make Arch look just like Ubuntu from the outside and Ubuntu whatever you like. Thing is, if you're a new user, you won't be able to differentiate between the two, the disadvantages for a new user in an arch environment far outweigh the advantages since you are susceptible to breaking your install. Ubuntu for newcomers to linux but I'm afraid it just isn't similar enough to archlinux I think it will be a much smoother experience and much less research to do all up front. My suggestion: Try out something like Ubuntu, Linux Mint, or Manjaro (either on bare metal or in a VM), get a good "feel" for how Linux works, and then use that experience to inform your decisions when you jump into Arch. You can read up on them on the wiki and come to a reasonable decision, but it's a lot easier if you don't have to do that at the same time as you're learning to do basic things like how to list the files in the terminal. The Arch installation process is going to ask you questions like "what sort of network manager do you want to use to connect to the Internet? Check out the wiki for two dozen different options". The last two are not strictly necessary for working with Linux, but if your eventual goal is to use Arch, then you'll need them. Understanding major components like systemd, pulseaudio, device drivers, and different filesystems (e.g., ext4, btrfs, zfs).Getting used to the terminal, familiarizing with basic shell commands.Finding alternatives for some software you may be used to on Windows.How the filesystem is organized (e.g., where things are stored, how drives/partitions are mounted).I learned a lot from my time with Ubuntu, because there are a lot of basics of using Linux that can be learned from any Linux distro: When I jumped in, I started with Ubuntu and eventually moved to Arch, but I found that staged approach helpful. If you're coming from Windows and wanting to jump into Linux, there's a lot to learn. public IP addresses or hostnames, account numbers, email addresses) before posting!ĭoes this sidebar need an addition or correction? Tell me here Note: ensure to redact or obfuscate all confidential or identifying information (eg. If you fix the problem yourself, please post your solution, so that others can also learn. ✻ Smokey says: don't wait for sleepy-head politicians - just follow my tips to fight climate change! If you're posting for help, please include the following details, so that we can help you more efficiently: Any distro, any platform! Explicitly noob-friendly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |